ABSTRACT: The Arms Regulation refers to limitations on the quantity or form of individual firearms, whereas the purpose
of disarmament is to remove arms either entirely or by separate meetings. The fundamental reason for arms control is to
reduce the danger of war or to reduce the destructive potential of war, whereas the purpose of demobilization is to end the
war. U.S. President Barack Obama resolved a world free from nuclear weapons. Obama said that the United States should
maintain nuclear discouragement during the demobilization method This study identifies obstacles and lacks mutual nuclear
deterrence and examines why progress in nuclear demilitarization since the collapse of the Soviet Union has missed the
amount of desire. No matter how much time-avoidance goes unaddressed, zero would be difficult to achieve worldwide.
Extensive early detection is more complex than commonly recognized. Simplicity and confidence-building measures cannot
be enhanced unless intertwined arms and nuclear arms issues such as critical, non-key, transmissible, non-sent and ordinary
weapons, such as rocket barriers, are dispersed. This would be achieved by a combination of legally restrictive negotiation,
political commitments and enlightened personal circumstances.
Keywords: Nuclear deterrence; Weapons; Dissuasion; cold war; Disarmament